Sono state raccolte e analizzate segnalazioni di utenti, recensioni e commenti provenienti da diverse fonti online, tra cui social media, forum e piattaforme di recensioni. Per estrarre dati significativi, è stato utilizzato un modello di intelligenza artificiale, capace di classificare automaticamente i contenuti in base a criteri positivi, negativi e neutri. Questo modello ha consentito di individuare le principali tendenze e problematiche segnalate dagli utenti, suddividendo i dati in categorie chiave.
Share on:
The sentiment of the public transport in the main Italian cities
Rome: delays and overcrowding dominate the sentiment
- Negative Sentiment: 70-75%
- Positive Sentiment: 25-30%
Rome receives a judgment predominantly negative by users online, with many criticisms related to the delays, crowding and poor maintenance of the public transport.
Main issues:
- Delays and overcrowding: waits for the bus and subway, especially during rush hours, are among the main complaints. The metro is often fills beyond capacity, making travel uncomfortable and stressful.
- Poor maintenance and cleaning: several reports show poor maintenance, the presence of vehicles, obsolete and hygienic conditions are not always optimal.
- Low-frequency and coverage of the device limited: the peripheral areas suffer from poor coverage, with long waits and links that are not very efficient with the city centre.
Positive aspects:
- The efficiency of the metro during off-peak hours: when less crowded, the metro is a quick and reliable option.
- Staff: drivers and controllers often receive appreciation for their availability and for their courtesy.
- Good coverage of transport in the city centre: many users recognize the capillarity of the bus service in the city centre, which allows travel relatively easy within the busy areas.
Milan: a model of efficiency with some of the shadow areas
- Negative Sentiment: 30-35%
- Positive Sentiment: 65-70%
Milan is a city with public transport more appreciated, thanks allthe efficiency of the metro, the sustainable mobility and investments in infrastructure.
Main issues:
- Delays occasional: although the reports about it are rather rare, delays at peak hours can make people uncomfortable, especially for commuters.
- The problems of cleanliness and maintenance: some of the buses and stations are not well-kept, with reports of a dirt and frequent technical failures.
- Peripheral coverage limited to: areas further away from the centre of Milan is served by lines which have a limited frequency, forcing the residents to long waits.
Positive aspects:
- Metro rapid and efficient: the punctuality, the high frequency of the rides and the rapidity of the movements make it one of the strong points of the city.
- Sustainable mobility integrated: the bike-sharing services, scooters and electric car-sharing are often praised for their integration with public transport, offering alternative practices on the use of private vehicles.
- Investment and ongoing development: many users appreciate the continuous development of the transport system in milan. The opening of new lines, the improvement of infrastructure and innovation are perceived as positive signs of a city in constant evolution.
Genoa: the service that does not convince, but with good ecological alternatives
- Negative Sentiment: 60-65%
- Positive Sentiment: 35-40%
As for Rome, Genoa, public transport is often criticized for low-frequency, overcrowding and poor maintenance.
Main issues:
- Low-frequency and overcrowding: many users reported delays and low frequency means, making the service less reliable
- Insufficient maintenance: the main messages concerning buses dated and conditions of cleaning is not always adequate and sufficient.
- Peripheral coverage limited to: recurrent problem is the low-frequency service in areas outside of the city, forcing the users to travel long and not very efficient.
Positive aspects:
- Ecological alternatives: Bikes and scooters in sharing are appreciated for their practicality, offering a sustainable option for short journeys in urban areas.
- The efficiency of the main lines: in the hours less crowded, the main lines of the city are to be quick and to the point.
- Good coverage in the city centre: The service in the central areas is well-distributed, thus facilitating the movements without long waits and offering a comfortable alternative to the car.
Naples, delays and inefficiencies, but with signs of improvement
- Negative Sentiment: 80-85%
- Positive Sentiment: 15-20%
Naples is among the cities with the sentiment more negative, characterized by constant delays, service interruptions, and a lack of coordination between the different lines of transport. However, the integration between the various means, and the good coverage of the tourist areas are points of strength.
Main issues:
- Frequent delays and lack punctuality according to users, the non-respect of the business affect the commuters, with long waits especially during peak hours.
- Frequent interruptions and disruptions: are frequent sudden breakdowns and cancellations not planned that makes the service very reliable.
- Poor planning of coincidences: The timetables of buses, subways and trains are not well synchronized, causing inconvenience to the passengers, and not allowing you to make changes easily.
Positive aspects:
- Transport services integrated: it is very much appreciated ticketing system unified, which allows you to use various mediums with ease.
- Ease-of-access for persons with disabilities: the public transport in Naples is considered to be relatively accessible, with stations equipped means to ensure travel easier for people with disabilities.
- Good attendance in the tourist areas: the tourist areas benefit from frequent and well-organized, allowing visitors and residents to move with ease between the main attractions of the city.
Palermo: the traffic that penalizes the service
- Negative Sentiment: 80-85%
- Positive Sentiment: 15-20%
Public transportation to Palermo is strongly criticized for the slowness of the service due to the congested traffic, and the poor maintenance of the vehicles. However, the night service and the coverage of the areas of the university are considered to be the positive aspects.
Main issues:
- Traffic and road congestion: the traffic slows to a bus stop, making them less reliable, and longer travel times.
- Poor comfort on board: users report the old buses, often without air conditioning, especially during the summer, and with the conditions of cleanliness judged to be insufficient.
- The absence of information in real time: it is reported the lack of a system to verify the location and times of the means of causing inconvenience in travel planning.
Positive aspects:
- Late night transportation: Night buses allow you to move even in the later hours, offering an alternative to the use of private cars.
- Efficiency during the holidays: During periods of high traffic, the service is perceived to be enhanced, with more frequent departures from the usual.
- Good coverage in the university areas: the area of the university is well served and connected with respect to the center of the city, facilitating the movement of students.
Bologna: a modern system, but with delays to improve
- Negative Sentiment: 40-45%
- Positive Sentiment: 55-60%
Bologna offers the public transport system is efficient and in constant evolutionbut suffer from frequent delays, and some issues related to security.
Main issues:
- Frequent delays on the lines: Many users complain about constant delays, especially during peak hours, with expectations for some of the buses that are too long and a little predictable, making it difficult to travel daily.
- Problems of safety equipment on board: Some passengers expressed concerns about the safety on board, telling the story of some of the incidents of theft or inappropriate behaviour that occurred on the means.
- Lack of updated information: Users complain about the poor communication on delays and itinerary changes.
Positive aspects:
- Good cleaning of transport: users appreciate the good level of cleanliness and bus stops, which are generally well maintained and cared for.
- Innovative services: positive comments on the system of contactless payment on board.
- Mobility alternative: The car sharing service electric is considered to be a valid alternative, sustainable, offering a practical option for those looking for transport solutions to the ecological and flexible.
